TCP-group 1994
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: Should we share?
- To: Raul Deluth Miller <rockwell@nova.umd.edu>, tcp-group@ucsd.edu
- Subject: Re: Should we share?
- From: "Chris Cox W0/G4JEC" <CHRISC@central.nmmc.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 07:24:32 CST6
- Organization: North Memorial Medical Center
- Priority: normal
> Here's how I'd manage ham ip, if it were mine to design:
>
> (*) mapping of call signs to ip numbers happens with DNS.
How would you propose to assign addresses to multiple devices? I
suppose that you could add an additional character to the callsign for
the various additional hosts, however, it does impose some artificial
limit on the number of hosts that can be addressed by any one
callsign. How would you handle more imaginitive hostnames than, for
example, G4JEC-X.
I suppose a host could have more than one name (or perhaps just use
the callsign+unit identifier just to create an ip address) but it
gets a little messy, does it not?
Chris
--
Chris
Chris Cox W0/G4JEC chrisc@Central.NMMC.Com
Network Analyst NIC Handle: CC345
North Memorial Medical Centre Tel: (612) 520-7321
3300 Oakdale Avenue North Fax: (612) 520-5237
Robbinsdale, MN 55422
Europeans consider 100 miles a long way.
Americans consider 100 years a long time.