TCP-group 1995
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Re: MACA, DUAL, FEC, etc.
- To: jmorriso@bogomips.ee.ubc.ca
- Subject: Re: MACA, DUAL, FEC, etc.
- From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 16:18:45 -0800
- Cc: tnc-tng@lantz.com, tcp-group@ucsd.edu
- In-reply-to: <m0rqo84-0004jfC@bogomips.ee.ubc.ca> (jmorriso@bogomips.ee.ubc.ca)
>- I've tested the error correcting code and it isn't fast enough even
> for 56kbps let alone higher, and if you have a multiple ports CPU
> loading gets worse. This sort of thing will have to go in the modem
> or TNC for high speeds, but can stay on the host CPU for low speeds.
Which ECC code? N9FZX's Reed-Solomon package? My convolutional
decoders can both handle symbol rates fastter than that, although to be
fair Paul said he had a lot of speed tricks he was planning to apply.
And what makes you think that the Z-80 CPU in the typical TNC will do
FEC any faster than the 486DX2 on a typical PC...? I've said it before
and I'll say it again -- we hams simply can't beat a mass-market PC
for price-performance on general purpose tasks and we shouldn't even
try. We should restrict our limited hardware development resources to
those things we *can't* buy in the mass computer market.
Phil
- Prev by Date:
MACA, DUAL, FEC, etc.
- Next by Date:
Re: FEC paper, implementation
- Previous by thread:
MACA, DUAL, FEC, etc.
- Next by thread:
Re: MACA, DUAL, FEC, etc.
- Index(es):