TCP-group 1992
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
TTYLINK Question
- To: jon@console.ais.org
- Subject: TTYLINK Question
- From: "Mike Bilow, mikebw@ids.jvnc.net" <mikebw@IDS.JVNC.NET>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 1992 22:53:08 EST
>>>Has anybody tweaked the ttylink code to allow a ttylink connection (telnet
>>>port 87) to be re-directed to a COM# async port? My reason for wanting this
>>>is to allow access to a RS232-equipped instrument to be accessed over the
>>>network.
>I'm working on making a telnet to port 23 do this. Basically, turning ka9q
>into a modem or async host (or whatever you want to attach) server.
>>into KISS mode or dialing a modem. There is also a "tip" command
>>which can be used to access a dumb terminal mode using one of the
>>asy interfaces.
>If I understand it correctly, tip allows the console (not a remote
>user) to talk to an asy port. Is there a way to "log in" to the
>console from a remote connection and do all the things that could be
>done from the console?
It is possible to connect to the mailbox by AX.25 or telnet and issue
the sysop ("@") command. If the proper bit mask is set in the FTPUSERS
file so that the user has sysop privileges, this command gives remote
access to the "net>" prompt. It is then legal to make routing changes,
start and stop processes, and so forth, as long as the commands issued
by the remote sysop do not start a session. In other words, everything
except "ftp" and the like are legal. (Shelling out is also, obviously,
illegal.)
Do you really want a remote user to have to capability to send raw data
directly to an interface? This starts to get far afield of what most
people do with NOS. I can see it from the local console, since the
code to do it is trivial, but anyone who has tried to write a "door"
in the landline BBS world will quickly appreciate the problem of having
a whole new "raw interface" server.
-- Mike N1BEE